I keep shaking my head, No.
News of the tragedy at Sandy Hook, images of our local community torn apart, causes me to shake my head from
side-to-side, involuntarily. No. Driving
to work in the morning, I hear the I95 DJ’s talking about the tragedy in Newtown,
I gaze numbly at the road ahead and my head shakes, this can’t be. Watching the news, pictures of cherubic first
graders, taken all too soon, there’s that movement again, No. Is this tragedy so big that I am subconsciously denying
it ever happened? Like a child avoiding bad news? Am I just unable to get a
handle on the fact that a lone gunman slaughtered all those kids with an
assault rifle as if he was at an arcade? For most of us, that’s it, it’s
unfathomable.
In trying to wrap my head around this inhumane tragedy, I’ve
been visited by the many stages of grief. Eventually, I do what we Americans
do, look for solutions to the problem. America has a problem if every couple of
months some disaffected boy gets a hold of a machine gun and thinks it’s okay
to commit mass-murder. We have to solve this problem, now. It’s bad, we have
come to the point of knowing, how these things go. There’s a predictable
pattern to the news coverage of a mass shooting and that’s just unacceptable.
We cannot, as a society, become desensitized to a killing spree of this
magnitude. It’s time to do something
about this. And we don’t need Congress or President Obama all we need is the
American people. There’s such a groundswell of support for a sea change that we
need to get it done, now.
Decrease violence in the visual market place. Our children
and young adults should not be bombarded with images of blood and slaughter. Clearly most normal kids can watch a slasher
flick or play “Call of Duty” and know enough to not shoot up their local
elementary school. Sure most kids know it’s a game and will go about their
daily routines but as we sadly know, sometimes there’s an outlier, an Adam
Lanza in any random sample. These games are abhorrent and our kids should not
be playing them, it HAS to desensitize all kids to the violence. Do we notice that the shooter is always a
boy? How many girls are playing Call of Duty? Think there’s a correlation? Who
could argue that these shooter games weighed into these boys winding up in a
crowded place with a machine gun? It had to be an influence, no? I would love to see video game makers stop making
these games but independent of that, we can stop buying them. We didn’t have
these games in the 50’s, 60’s or 70’s. Do we really think it's a coincidence that terror did not visit our country in this manner back then? Shouldn’t we remove this
variable on the off chance it just MIGHT cause these shootings? Aren’t we
willing to stop smoking because it just might help our heart health? So why not
try to quit violent video games, as a nation?
Another analogy might help: All New Yorkers are now standing away from the platform as the train is pulling into the station. Why? 5 million people commute on the subway every day. Multiply that times days in a week, then year, the probability that you will be shoved in front of a Brooklyn bound F train is miniscule. Yet we all stand away on the off-chance that some psycho might try to push us in front of the train. Statistically it makes no sense to have this fear, but it’s a simple solution that will take away the chance for tragedy. And that’s what we should do to help decrease these killings; make the small changes that might decrease the probability of this happening again. Decreasing the violent images our kids see, our society sees, is one of those changes, like moving away from the edge of the platform.
If kids are playing less video games, they’ll be outside, socializing. Were there less of these shootings when we were kids because we knew each other better? I can’t help but think the “suburbanization” of our world, where it’s so easy to go about our days and only interact with people via a computer, has altered our society. We are becoming socially inept and in extreme cases, people hunker down in their basements, get trapped inside the scary world inside their head and eventually become Adam Lanza. I know I am a hopeless romantic, and admittedly I know very little about the Lanza family dynamics, but if Nancy Lanza took Adam to visit his cousins? If she took him on hikes on our beautiful
The mental health of the shooter is always part of the post-shooting discussion. As a school teacher, over the past 16 years, we have seen
an excellent move in the right direction on anti-bullying. As you know, this
was in reaction to the boys who perpetrated the shootings like Columbine. For a
few years in the late 90’s, boys who were bullied were choosing to kill, for
revenge. Because of this, our entire society now speaks a language of
anti-bullying; there was a sea change. Today, teachers, students and parents
are ultra-aware of the signs and evils of bullying. Now by all accounts,
Adam Lanza does not seem to have been bullied; I daresay an outcome of
Columbine. But something was clearly amiss with this young man. And there seems
to be some commonalities with Adam Lanza and our more recent mass murderers. I
can’t believe we now talk about them so cavalierly. We as a society should be
more aware of boys who are at risk of falling off the deep end and into an
elementary school with an assault rifle. We have to become better at identifying,
diagnosing and treating the small percentage of young men who are in danger of
becoming the next Adam Lanza. Please
hear me, I am not suggesting a witch hunt but a collective awareness, just like
we had in the wake of Columbine for bullying. We should all be looking for the warning
signs so that we can intervene. These boys are not social pariahs, we should
not look askance at them, we should be reaching out to them, intervening,
nurturing them and giving them strategies on how to maintain friendships and
communicate with peers. If these boys had gotten strategies in early childhood
on how to better interact with society, just maybe, we could have avoided these
tragedies.
I am not for outlawing guns. In
The NRA is a powerful organization but there are only 4 million members. And a decent percentage, (George Stephanopoulos said 74%) of members support a ban on assault weapons. We Americans are over 300 million strong, we don’t need the NRA, Congress or President Obama to get rid of these weapons. We have to use our outrage, in the wake of Newtown, to make this change. Like Dawn Hochsprung, and her incredibly brave staff, we should be running towards this problem, it’s the least we can do. As Americans we should do anything to decrease these shootings: protest, boycott, start a letter writing campaign, submit editorials, reach out to our president, senator, representative, neighbor…Now we might not be able to end shootings of this kind but like the heart disease patient, shouldn’t we at least make changes to decrease the probability? Wouldn’t we live in a better country if we at least made some changes to decrease the chances that this kind of tragedy would be visited on another innocent American community? It’s just common sense.